🌿 Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters
Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters is a natural health supplement specially formulated to:
- ✅ Promote general wellness
- ✅ Detoxify the body
- ✅ Support the treatment of various ailments
Made from a powerful blend of 100% organic and medicinal herbs, Ruzu is completely alcohol-free, making it ideal for:
- 👪 All age groups
- 🌱 Health-conscious individuals
- 🌿 Anyone seeking non-alcoholic herbal remedies
Whether you're looking to boost your vitality, cleanse your system, or support healing the natural way, Ruzu Bitters offers a trusted herbal solution.
The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, on Monday struck out an application filed by former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, seeking to strike out the ₦110 billion fraud charge instituted against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Justice Maryanne Anenih who presided over the court held that it has jurisdiction to entertain the case and ordered that the trial should continue.
It was said that Bello is on trial in Charge No. FCT/CR/778/2024: FRN v. Yahaya Adoza Bello & 2 Ors.
The former governor, through his lead counsel, J.B. Daudu (SAN), had urged the court to quash the 16-count charge, contending that the FCT High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the case.
He also argued that the case was an abuse of court process as a related criminal case involving him was already pending before the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The defence argued that the fact of the existence of Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024 before the Federal High Court made the present proceedings improper.
The EFCC’s lawyer, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), opposed the application, describing it as misconceived and aimed at delaying the trial.
Pinheiro argued that the offences in the charge were based on provisions of the Penal Code and were therefore properly triable before the FCT High Court.
He also argued that several properties allegedly acquired with the proceeds of the offences were located in Abuja thereby giving the court territorial jurisdiction over the matter.
On the allegation of abuse of court process, the senior advocate contended that the charges before the two courts were different in nature and substance.
He said the case before the FCT High Court was one of alleged conspiracy and criminal breach of trust under Penal Code, while the case before the Federal High Court was one of alleged money laundering offences under the Money Laundering Act.
Pinheiro also noted that the parties in the two cases were not the same, explaining that Bello was the only defendant in the Federal High Court case, while he was being tried with two co-defendants before the FCT High Court.
Justice Anenih ruling on June 16, 2026 agreed with the submissions of the EFCC and held that the court had the requisite jurisdiction to hear the case.
The judge also found that the proceedings did not amount to an abuse of court process.
The court therefore dismissed Bello’s application in its entirety.
The third defendant in the case had filed a similar application, which was also dismissed as having no merit.
Justice Anenih thereafter ordered that the trial should go on.
The court then asked the prosecution to continue with their case by calling their 16th witness who was in court and ready to give evidence.
