Conflicting Medical Reports, Intimidation Claims Raise Fresh Concerns in Sexual Assault of Three-Year-Old in Lagos

Conflicting Medical Reports, Intimidation Claims Raise Fresh Concerns in Sexual Assault of Three-Year-Old in Lagos

By Naomi Onome

A disturbing case involving the alleged sexual abuse of a three-year-old girl in the Ejigbo area of Lagos State has taken a troubling turn, with conflicting medical reports, allegations of intimidation, and claims of attempted cover-up now at the centre of the matter.

The case, which is of urgent public interest, was brought to the Ambassador for Peace and Enlightenment Foundation (AMPEF), following a distress call received on March 20, 2026.

According to Comrade Neye Solomon, AMPEF’s case manager, he and a senior colleague, Comrade Prince Saviour Iche, the founder of AMPEF, visited the residence of the child’s mother, Mrs Ogechi Okoye, in the Powerline area of Ejigbo, Lagos State, where they met her with visible injuries, including bruises on her face and mouth.

The mother alleged that she was assaulted by individuals linked to the prime suspect who defiled her daughter in an attempt to force her to withdraw the case from the Lagos State Police Command Gender Unit.

She further stated that the incident dates back to the first week of December 2025, when a man identified as “Monday” allegedly assaulted her three-year-old daughter. Two other minors, aged five and eight, were also said to be connected to the case; it is alleged that the perpetrator “Monday” also defiled the minors.

Controversial Medical Findings

Initial medical examination was reportedly conducted at the Mirabel Centre by the head physician (Name Withheld). However, the outcome of the examination allegedly stated that the child was suffering from an infection.

The AMPEF case manager, however, questioned the credibility of that report, stating that during a follow-up visit on March 28, 2026, the child was found in a critical condition, with persistent bleeding and mucous discharge.

The mother also alleged that the examination process at the first facility was not thorough, claiming that no comprehensive tests were conducted before the child was discharged with medication.

Second Examination Contradicts Initial Report

Dissatisfied with the initial findings, Solomon said he approached the Gender Unit and obtained approval for a second medical evaluation.

The child was subsequently taken to another medical facility, where doctors reportedly conducted a fresh examination.

According to Solomon, the second assessment revealed severe injuries consistent with sexual penetration, contradicting the earlier diagnosis of infection.

He further disclosed that the extent of the injuries observed raised serious medical concerns and necessitated urgent and continued treatment for the child.

Allegations of Intimidation and Possible Compromise

The case has also been marred by allegations of interference and possible attempts to influence its outcome.

The child’s mother claimed that individuals approached her with offers of money to withdraw the case, while also alleging that she was physically assaulted to silence her.

There were also alleged claims of financial transactions involving persons connected to the case: the NGO personnel identified as Blessing, the attending doctor at Mirabel Center and the legal consultant. Although these have not been independently confirmed.

When contacted, individuals mentioned in the handling of the case initially provided varying accounts regarding their roles, including explanations about delays and delegation of responsibility for the child’s medical care.

Call for Transparency and Justice

The AMPEF case manager emphasised that the case has now been returned to the appropriate authorities for further investigation, with a follow-up expected.

He called for a thorough and transparent probe into both the alleged abuse and the handling of the case, stressing that the matter must not be compromised.

“This is a matter of urgent public interest. A vulnerable child is involved, and justice must not only be done but be seen to be done,” he said.

As of the time of filing this report, authorities have yet to release an official statement.

The case has since sparked concern among advocates and the public, with renewed calls for stronger safeguards in handling cases involving minors and stricter accountability for all parties involved.