🌿 Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters
Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters is a natural health supplement specially formulated to:
- ✅ Promote general wellness
- ✅ Detoxify the body
- ✅ Support the treatment of various ailments
Made from a powerful blend of 100% organic and medicinal herbs, Ruzu is completely alcohol-free, making it ideal for:
- 👪 All age groups
- 🌱 Health-conscious individuals
- 🌿 Anyone seeking non-alcoholic herbal remedies
Whether you're looking to boost your vitality, cleanse your system, or support healing the natural way, Ruzu Bitters offers a trusted herbal solution.
It is now appropriate to fortify the established institutions and increase their efficiency in carrying out their duty.
Remember that observers believe that many palaces have become political playgrounds, and there have been worries about the politicization of the ancient institution.
They claim that contract-seekers and sycophants have taken over the hallways that were formerly known for community justice and sound guidance.
One of our informants claims that “political survival and patronage have come at the expense of the stool’s dignity.”
States like Katsina, Adamawa, and Kano are the places where this unsettling tendency is most noticeable.
We saw the violent politicization of the emirate in Kano, when a centuries-old institution was purposefully destroyed in the name of control and retribution.
“Divisive politics have undermined traditional cohesion in Adamawa.” The voices of moral courage and tradition are in danger of being silenced in Katsina due to encroaching meddling.
Professors Taoheed Adedoja and Tunde Adeniran, two former ministers, are at odds over a proposed constitutional amendment that would create a formal and consistent financial system for traditional institutions.
The House Committee on Constitution Review, led by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu, adopted a proposal that led to the bill’s current status in the House of Representatives.
In order to give traditional councils nationwide a specific source of finance, the committee is recommending a modification to Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
Funds held to the credit of local government councils in a state “shall be distributed among the local government councils of that state on such terms and in such manner as may be prescribed by the House of Assembly of the state,” according to Section 162 of the Constitution, which regulates the Distributable Pool Account.
As part of the proposed modification, the committee suggests adding a new clause that requires state legislatures to pass legislation requiring the direct funding of traditional councils after Subsection (8).
The new clause specifically mandates that a House of Assembly “make a law for the direct payment of not less than five percent of the amount standing to the credit of the local government councils in the state to the head of the traditional council in that state.”
The amendment, if approved, would provide traditional institutions with a constitutionally guaranteed source of revenue for the first time, removing their dependency on state and local governments’ discretionary subventions.
In an exclusive interview, former education minister Prof. Adeniran warned against the perils of forcing traditional institutions to adopt a standardized national model.
According to his argument, subnational governments are in a better position to decide how to run these institutions given their unique requirements and histories.
“The importance of traditional institutions varies from state to state,” he remarked. They shouldn’t be subjected to national homogeneity and politicization. Constitutional provisions for traditional institutions shouldn’t be used to exacerbate federal problems and challenges; these are matters for the states to handle.
In stark contrast to Adeniran’s stance, Prof. Adedoja, a former Minister of Sports and Special Duties, has endorsed the proposed revision.
Adedoja commended parliamentarians for bringing about the constitutional reform and urged widespread support, emphasizing the significance of traditional rulers in grassroots governance and dispute resolution.
“In all Nigerian local governments, traditional institutions are closest to the people at the community level,” he stated. They use culturally approved methods to mediate conflicts, resolve land and family issues, and keep the peace.
They can react quickly to these local disputes thanks to budgetary backing, which eases the burden on formal courts that are overburdened with cases. “In local government areas, traditional institutions help maintain peace and order,” he informed our correspondent.
Adedoja asserts that constitutional support for traditional council funding is justified solely by the maintenance of cultural and social values.
“Traditional rulers are stewards of indigenous culture, history, and moral values,” he stated. Funding helps to preserve local history, organize cultural events, and spread ideals that encourage citizens to be united, respectful, and self-assured.
“This cultural stability enhances social cohesion and supports community development initiatives by local governments.”
The former minister also cited community mobilization for security and development as justification for the proposed bill.
“Traditional institutions are effective channels for mobilizing communities for development initiatives like sanitation, public health campaigns, education enrollment, and local security efforts,” he continued.
“Budgetable allocations improve their ability to work with local governments to implement policies at the grassroots level, support vigilante and early-warning systems, and engage stakeholders.”
Since Nigeria’s restoration to democratic governance in 1999, the fight for constitutional funding and recognition of traditional institutions has taken center stage in constitutional discussions.
The current Constitution does not provide traditional rulers any official place in the governing structure, despite their impact on grassroots mobilization, cultural preservation, dispute resolution, and community governance.
Despite their ongoing significance, reformers contend that this exclusion has undermined conventional institutions, especially in rural areas where they frequently serve as the closest authority to the populace. Traditional leaders, according to their supporters, are essential allies in addressing security issues, resolving intercommunal conflicts, assisting with public health initiatives, and fostering local development.
The proposed amendment’s proponents argue that constitutional funding will improve conventional institutions’ efficacy, independence, and dignity. They contend that the current funding structure, which is mostly reliant on the cooperation of governors or chairmen of local governments, leaves traditional leaders vulnerable to political pressure and compromises their objectivity.
They claim that a statutory funding structure would increase administrative capacity, provide predictability and transparency, and enhance traditional councils’ power to assist grassroots government. While legally acknowledging the historical and social relevance of traditional authority inside Nigeria’s federal structure, they nevertheless maintain that distributing a small portion of local government funding will not disrupt budgetary balances.
Legislative discussions on the plan are anticipated to center on accountability and the lack of clearly defined constitutional powers for traditional rulers, topics that opponents have brought up.
