🌿 Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters
Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters is a natural health supplement specially formulated to:
- ✅ Promote general wellness
- ✅ Detoxify the body
- ✅ Support the treatment of various ailments
Made from a powerful blend of 100% organic and medicinal herbs, Ruzu is completely alcohol-free, making it ideal for:
- 👪 All age groups
- 🌱 Health-conscious individuals
- 🌿 Anyone seeking non-alcoholic herbal remedies
Whether you're looking to boost your vitality, cleanse your system, or support healing the natural way, Ruzu Bitters offers a trusted herbal solution.
The Federal High Court, Abuja, yesterday dismissed a suit filed by a member of the House of Representatives, Leke Abejide, for lack of merit, upholding the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), led by former Senate President David Mark.
Mark describes the court verdict that upheld his leadership of the party as a victory for democracy and justice as it also reinforces Nigeria’s constitutional order beyond the party itself.
Also, the presidential candidate of ADC, Atiku Abubakar, commended the judiciary for showing courage, independence and fidelity to the Constitution in the face of “sustained attempts by desperate political actors to weaponise the courts against the opposition”.
The ADC has hailed the court for dismissing the case and said the ruling cleared lingering court cases on the party’s leadership.
Justice Musa Liman, in his judgment, held that the preliminary objections raised by ADC, its former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu, Mark and its National Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola, were valid.
The judge held that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter as it bordered on the internal affairs of a political party which he described as non-justiciable.
Justice Liman also ruled that Abejide lacked the locus standi to institute the suit because he failed to prove how his rights were infringed upon by the emergence of the present ADC leadership.
He also ruled that the lawmaker had not exhausted the party’s internal dispute resolution mechanism before coming to the court.
The judge also ruled in favour of the defendants on the issues raised in the substantive suit.
Liman said the emergence of Mark and Aregbesola as the party’s leaders was legal because the transfer of leadership by Nwosu did not contravene the ADC constitution. He said the July 2, 2025 stakeholders’ meeting where Nwosu handed over the party’s leadership was held before the National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting of July 29, 2025, which officially produced Mark and Aregbesola as the party’s national chairman and national secretary, respectively, under the supervision of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The court held that the emergence of the duo was in line with the ADC constitution and the Electoral Act, 2026.
Thereafter, Justice Liman awarded costs of N2 million each against Abejide in favour of the defendants. He also ordered that the counsel to Abejide should pay N10 million as costs in accordance with the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026.
In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025, filed on February 15, Abejide sued the ADC, Nwosu, Mark, Aregbesola and INEC, seeking to nullify the handover of the party’s leadership to them on July 2, 2025.
Among other reliefs, the lawmaker asked for an order restraining Mark and Aregbesola from parading themselves as the national chairman and national secretary of the party and an injunction restraining INEC from recognising them as ADC leadership, saying their emergence did not follow the party’s constitution and the relevant provisions of the Electoral Act.
The ruling might have put the lid on the fight for leadership of the ADC, but Mark said it has wider implications for the party.
The party chairman said the judgement re-affirmed the independence of the judiciary and boosted confidence in Nigeria’s democratic process and the right of political parties to operate without interference.
Mark made the comments in a statement signed by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Kola Ologbondiyan, who described the judgment as another milestone in Nigeria’s democratic journey and reiterated the ADC’s commitment to constitutional governance.
He said, “This is not just a victory for our party but a victory for democracy, justice and every Nigerian that believes in a vibrant political system where ideas compete freely and the will of the people ultimately prevails.”
He said the judgment vindicated ADC’s long standing belief in multi-party democracy, rule of law and the constitutional right of all Nigerians to freely associate and participate in the political process.
Reacting to the ruling, Atiku in a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, said the ruling was a victory not for the party alone, but for constitutional democracy and the rule of law.
He said the court’s ruling reaffirmed the long-standing legal principle that political parties are governed by their constitutions and that internal disputes should be first addressed through the mechanisms provided in them.
“[T]he court could not have been clearer. It rightly ruled that the matter is bordering on the internal affairs of the ADC, that the Federal High Court lacks jurisdiction and that the plaintiffs neither exhausted the internal remedies provided by the party’s constitution nor established the locus standi required to invoke the jurisdiction of the court,” the statement said.
Liman’s refusal to allow the judiciary to become an extension of partisan political warfare was lauded by the former Vice President who said the ruling was a reminder that “while political desperation may cast temporary shadows over our democracy, truth and justice will ultimately prevail.”














