🌿 Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters
Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters is a natural health supplement specially formulated to:
- ✅ Promote general wellness
- ✅ Detoxify the body
- ✅ Support the treatment of various ailments
Made from a powerful blend of 100% organic and medicinal herbs, Ruzu is completely alcohol-free, making it ideal for:
- 👪 All age groups
- 🌱 Health-conscious individuals
- 🌿 Anyone seeking non-alcoholic herbal remedies
Whether you're looking to boost your vitality, cleanse your system, or support healing the natural way, Ruzu Bitters offers a trusted herbal solution.
Justice G. A. Opayinka of the Oyo State High Court has been asked to issue a subpoena to the necessary parties to testify against the President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Afam Osigwe, SAN, in a case that wants to stop the bar election set for July 2026.
The plaintiffs, who are members of the NBA and filed suit number 1/221/2026, asked the court to stop all preparations for the election until the case was resolved.
The plaintiffs in the case are Ibrahim Lawal, Esq., Raymond Oki, Esq., Omotan Olusola Ogunmodede, Esq., and Chief Gabriel Ojo Adekunle Ijalana, Esq. The NBA’s Incorporated Trustees, NBA President Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, the Body of Benchers, the Attorney General of the Federation (in his role as Chairman of the General Council of the Bar), Aham Ejelam, SAN, Ibrahim Aliyu Nasarawa, Esq, Muhamad M. Nuhu, Esq, Uju Okafor, Esq, and Ume Maduka, Esq, are the first to ninth defendants, in that order.
Justice Opayinka granted the reliefs asked for in an exparte motion filed by the applicants on March 4, 2026.
The judge said, “The 5th to 9th defendants/respondents are hereby restrained by themselves, their agents, privies or assigns from parading or holding themselves out as the chairman, secretary or members of the Electoral Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association (ECNBA) or from performing, undertaking or participating in any acts, step or process whatsoever in furtherance of the conduct of the 2026 National Officers’ Election of the Nigerian Bar Association, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice for Interlocutory Injunction dated 19th February, 2026.
“The 2nd defendant (NBA President) is not allowed to do anything to set up or make up the Electoral Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association, or to take part in, supervise, influence, or otherwise interfere with the 2026 NBA National Officers’ Election in any way, until the motion for Interlocutory Injunction is heard and decided.”
The court still has the case, which it adjourned to March 12, 2026, to hear the motion for an interlocutory injunction after the ex-parte order.
But lawyers from the Nigerian Law Society (NLS) and the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP) have asked Justice Opayinka to subpoena some people to “testify against the NBA President and his media team’s pattern of refusing to comply with Rule 33 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners, 2023.”
Rule 33 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners, 2023, says that lawyers who are involved in a case that is still going on or is expected to go on must not make statements outside of court that could affect a fair trial, judgment, or sentence. This is to make sure that the sub-judice rule is followed.
In an amicus curiae brief to Justice Opayinka dated March 17, 2026, Akwarandu listed the people who would be called to testify as Rasheed Murtala Abdul-Rasheed, SAN, the former NBA publicity secretary, Niko El-Farlo, Dr. Clinton Tonye Jaja, and Jimoh Hammed, Esq., the head of the Advocacy for Bar License Freedom (ABLIF).
The amicus curiae brief said, “Our client, on behalf of several Nigerian lawyers, both individually and collectively, respectively requests your Lordship to invoke Order 41 Rule 16 of the Oyo State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2022, and sections 20 and 83(3) of the Evidence Act, 2011, as amended to issue a subpoena for the under-listed necessary parties.
“Our client told us that the testimonies of the lawyers named above are important to prove that the President of the NBA and his friends often break the rule about matters that are still being decided.
“Our client wants this intervention because if your Honorable Court doesn’t follow the laws and impose the right penalties and sanctions, people will always take your Honorable Court’s respect and reputation for granted.
“Our client is asking this on behalf of more than 2,500 lawyers who are members of the Nigerian Law Society (NLS) and the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP).
In an addendum to the amicus curiae brief dated April 7, 2026, ALDRAP asked for the admission of a public statement that NBA President allegedly made that is relevant to the ongoing lawsuit.
ALDRAP said that the NBA President had admitted to nominating both the chairman and secretary of the NBA electoral committee as NBA nominees to fill positions in the Body of Benchers. This was based on the public statement.
ALDRAP said that the move could affect the NBA election in favor of preferred candidates. They also said that out of more than 200,000 NBA members, people who weren’t responsible for running the election should have been nominated for the positions. The group made it clear that the person in charge of running the election must be neutral and fair.
ALDRAP also said that the lawsuit against the NBA election is asking the court to make the chairman and secretary of the electoral committee step down.
