🌿 Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters
Ruzu Non-Alcoholic Herbal Bitters is a natural health supplement specially formulated to:
- ✅ Promote general wellness
- ✅ Detoxify the body
- ✅ Support the treatment of various ailments
Made from a powerful blend of 100% organic and medicinal herbs, Ruzu is completely alcohol-free, making it ideal for:
- 👪 All age groups
- 🌱 Health-conscious individuals
- 🌿 Anyone seeking non-alcoholic herbal remedies
Whether you're looking to boost your vitality, cleanse your system, or support healing the natural way, Ruzu Bitters offers a trusted herbal solution.
The Supreme Court put off making a decision on Wednesday in the appeal filed by David Mark, the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), who is challenging the court’s right to get involved in the party’s internal matters.
A five-member panel of the highest court, led by Justice Garba Mohammed, put off making a decision right after lawyers for both sides submitted their briefs of argument for and against the appeal.
Jibrin Okutepa, SAN, who spoke for David Mark, told the court that the issue was over when the apex court ruled on March 21, 2025, that “no court has jurisdiction to entertain cases bordering on internal affairs of political parties.”
Okutepa then asked the highest court to let the appeal go through and say that the Abuja Federal High Court did not have the authority to hear a case that was related to the ADC’s internal affairs.
Robert Emukpero, SAN, who represented the first respondent, Nafiu Gombe, told the highest court to reject the appeal and uphold the lower court’s decision that the case was too early and should be thrown out.
A three-member panel of the appellate court had thrown out Mark’s appeal, which questioned whether the Abuja Federal High Court, led by Justice Emeka Nwite, had the right to hear the case that Bala had brought against the leadership of the ADC.
The appellate court said that the appeal was not only too early, but it was also filed without permission from the trial court.
The appellate court then told the trial court to quickly hear the case again and said that the parties should keep things as they are.
After the order for status quo, the electoral umpire took away the ADC leadership’s recognition, which was led by Mark, until the court could decide the issue.
Mark was unhappy with the appellate court’s decision and an order to keep things the same, so he went to the Supreme Court to challenge both.
The highest court told the parties to file their briefs for and against the appeal instead of the motions that were filed in the appeal.
Justice Garba said that the judgment would be made on a date that would be communicated to the parties after hearing their arguments.
